Useful YouTube Video: Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V Demo on Quad-Core Intel Xeon

If you’re interested in Microsoft Hype-V Technology, I’ve found viewing the following YouTube video worth the 4-1/2 minutes: Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V Demo on Quad-Core Intel Xeon

Originally posted 2009-02-15 07:53:11. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

VMware Lab Manager 3.0 Requires VirtualCenter

After spending a week on what should have been an easy project to designing a student lab environment at a well known online university, I am now stumped because of a change in VMware’s Lab Manager 3.0 requirements. Lab Manager 3.0 now requires VirtualCenter which poses a problem because this lab environment is isolated for security reasons away from the administration and production network.

In previous Lab Manager installs, I’ve just setup an ESX host, configured a VM with Windows Server 2003, installed the Lab Manager software and added the host servers for the lab environment. No VirtualCenter was required and it worked perfect on local storage. Now unless businesses are willing to redesign their networks, they will require another VirtualCenter for the  Lab Manager 3.0 environment to remain isolated.

Options are: 1) pay the extra $ for the VirtualCenter or 2) install older version of Lab Manager 2.5 (about $1295 per socket) or 3) $0, do without Lab Manager.

Originally posted 2009-01-21 18:30:25. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Veeam Monitor Captures My Attention

Veeam Monior is certainly the best monitoring software for VMware that I have ever evaluated. And, aside from it not being distributed as a virtual appliance, it’s worth the time for a simple install that requires a Windows server to host it.

What’s Veeam Monitor’s Value?

Want reports that are easy to customize and look professional, alerts that are meaningful, stats on disk latency and IOPS and graphs that say it all – Veeam Monitor can deliver them all.

You won’t get unnecessary flash animation or colored arrows but you will get real-time data that will help manage and report your VMware Infrastructure metrics.

The full version of Veeam Monitor features additional enterprise-oriented features including access to:

  • Performance history
  • Full storage monitoring capabilities
  • Trend analysis and capacity planning with scheduled reporting
  • Drill-down into a VM, ESX and vCenter for Windows and Linux process monitoring and management
  • Unlimited alarms and alarm modeling

But I like try before I buy and Veeam monitor has a free version that allows just that. I was amazed with how much I could do with the free version.overall_free

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Veeam Monitor is a tool worth installing. Here’s the link to Veeam’s website: http://www.veeam.com/esxi-monitoring-free.html

Note: Tested with VirtualCenter 2.5 U4 and ESX 3.5 U4 and vSphere 4.0 (VC 4.0 and ESX 4.0)

Originally posted 2009-11-01 08:38:59. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Microsoft Hyper-V Debutes for $28 per License

The long awaited Microsoft Virtual Server dubbed Hyper-V has now been released. At $28 a license, verses $7, 000 – $14,00 for VMware ESX, it should be well received with the economy possibly suffering from a recession.

Should you install Hyper-V instead of VMware VI? Let’s see, one of the many purposes of virtualization is to consolidate physical servers, especially those on old hardware that is out of warranty, to new hardware still in warranty. Granted VMware VI has quite a few whistles and bells such as HA, DRS and vMotion but I’m sure Microsoft will soon be able to duplicate these features and at $28, it might be worth the risk to consolidate those file , print or web servers to Hyper-V.

Here’s what Microsoft has to say about Hyper-V

Introducing Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V

Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V, the next-generation hypervisor-based server virtualization technology, allows you to make the best use of your server hardware investments by consolidating multiple server roles as separate virtual machines (VMs) running on a single physical machine. With Hyper-V, you can also efficiently run multiple different operating systems—Windows, Linux, and others—in parallel, on a single server, and fully leverage the power of x64 computing. Read more…

Where’s the catch Microsoft?

Here’s the catch, I think… I searched around and couldn’t find a version of Hyper-V that installs on Windows Server 2003, so you’ll need Windows 2008 to run Hyper-V.  That means more Microsoft license fees? This may not be a problem if you’re a Windows shop already headed in this direction and the money’s already in your IT budget, but what about shops that can’t upgrade due to strict compliance rules? Are they out of luck until Windows Server 2008 is approved for production? These are just a few questions I’ll have to research.

VMinstall.com Hyper-V Trials

I decided to download Windows Server 2008 and get started learning Hyper-V. More blogs to come on this subject. Here’s a link to Microsoft’s Hyper-V downloads (actually for Windows Server 2008 with Hyper-V) if you’re interested in testing out Hyper-V. Download Hyper-V

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=F3AB3D4B-63C8-4424-A738-BADED34D24ED&displaylang=en

Also, here’s a step by step guide and instructions for how to install Hyper-V.

http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/library/c513e254-adf1-400e-8fcb-c1aec8a029311033.mspx?mfr=true

Hyper-V Installation Prerequisites and Requirements

http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/library/c513e254-adf1-400e-8fcb-c1aec8a029311033.mspx?mfr=true

VMware Virtual Infrastructure Vs. Microsoft Server 2008 Hyper-V

It’s too early to call a winner but I would definitely suggest checking out Hyper-V. I know first hand how expensive VMware renewals are so maybe if you don’t need all the whistles and bells that VMware offers, setting up a couple of Windows Server 2008 machines with Hyper-V might save you some money. Don’t get me wrong, I love VMware but I’ve supported it long enough to have formed an opinion on some of the down side (support and costs).

Here’s where I cut you loose to decide for yourself and please remember to recommend VMinstall.com to you friends.

Originally posted 2008-07-04 07:29:49. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

P2V – Step by Step Removing Physical Hardware

DevManIt’s been a while since I had to P2V a Windows server but recently I found myself on a project doing P2Vs of business critical servers, again.

FYI: The new version of VMware VM Converter works great for converting a physical Windows and Lunux server into a virtual server.

Once the conversion is completed, the new VM is online, VMtools are installed and video acceleration is set, here’s a couple more steps I learned about at a VMUG meeting that I recommend doing to finish the P2V job.

First – Remove Old Physical Hardware from the New Windows VM (picture shows “grayed” disk drives)

Step 1 -  Log into the VM

Step 2 -  Open a command prompt
-    Start > Run
-    CMD
-    Enter

Step 3 – At the prompt type: set devmgr_show_nonpresent_devices=1
-    Enter
-    Type: start devmgmt.msc
-    Enter

Step 4 – Wait for the Device Manager to open, then click on View > Show Hidden Devices
- Expand each category and search for “grayed” hardware
- Right click and click uninstall when “grayed” hardware is located
- Don’t worry about the System Devices category
- When all the hardware devices are gone, close the Device Manager and reboot

Second – Uninstall Old Hardware Specific Software

Step 1 – Log into the VM

Step 2- Start > Control Panel > Add/Remove Programs

Step 3 – Carefully find and uninstall programs from IBM/Dell/HP/other that are used for drive arrays, networking, ILO or any other similar application that is specific to the physical hardware.

Note: These items are not required now that the server hardware has been virtualized.

Done – When all the applications have been uninstalled, close the Control Panel and reboot

Q: Why do this?

A: The reason I do these steps is because over the years I’ve had to troubleshoot VMs that I found were P2V’d by someone else and not cleaned up. This normally causes poor performance and issues with ghost hardware that conflict with the virtual hardware devices, more specific – network adapters.

There – now all you need to do is make sure all your best practices are applied to the VM and it’s ready for production.

Originally posted 2009-09-19 07:22:18. Republished by Blog Post Promoter