<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Ready for vSphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vminstall.com/not-ready-for-vsphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vminstall.com/not-ready-for-vsphere/</link>
	<description>Step by Step Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:36:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.vminstall.com/not-ready-for-vsphere/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminstall.com/?p=752#comment-614</guid>
		<description>On Thursday I heard a rumor at the Phoenix VMUG meeting that Storage Vmotion will be removed from vSphere 4.0 Standard and offered in vSphere 4.0 PLUS. Looks like another reason to stay on ESX 3.5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday I heard a rumor at the Phoenix VMUG meeting that Storage Vmotion will be removed from vSphere 4.0 Standard and offered in vSphere 4.0 PLUS. Looks like another reason to stay on ESX 3.5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtualization Short Take #28 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</title>
		<link>http://www.vminstall.com/not-ready-for-vsphere/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualization Short Take #28 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminstall.com/?p=752#comment-587</guid>
		<description>[...] you ready for vSphere, or are you like this gentleman? It&#8217;s a tough position for VMware&#8212;many users are happy with ESX 3.5 and don&#8217;t see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you ready for vSphere, or are you like this gentleman? It&#8217;s a tough position for VMware&#8212;many users are happy with ESX 3.5 and don&#8217;t see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editor</title>
		<link>http://www.vminstall.com/not-ready-for-vsphere/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminstall.com/?p=752#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Rick,

Thanks for the comment. I asked my VMware Support Engineer when a major service release was coming out for vSphere and he said expect one at the end of October.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. I asked my VMware Support Engineer when a major service release was coming out for vSphere and he said expect one at the end of October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Herman</title>
		<link>http://www.vminstall.com/not-ready-for-vsphere/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminstall.com/?p=752#comment-574</guid>
		<description>I too am waiting for update 1.  Has any information been given on when that is expected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am waiting for update 1.  Has any information been given on when that is expected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladan</title>
		<link>http://www.vminstall.com/not-ready-for-vsphere/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminstall.com/?p=752#comment-573</guid>
		<description>Well, sure there is no rush to upgrade, but when you see that your existing hardware could manage even more VMs with vSphere. And with vSphere you have the final protection and no downtime - Fault Tolerance. 

Also there is ESX 3.5 U5 which can handle up to 80 vms per host...

Vladan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, sure there is no rush to upgrade, but when you see that your existing hardware could manage even more VMs with vSphere. And with vSphere you have the final protection and no downtime &#8211; Fault Tolerance. </p>
<p>Also there is ESX 3.5 U5 which can handle up to 80 vms per host&#8230;</p>
<p>Vladan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

